941 Partial Differential Equations
Fall 2007
Office Hours: Wed 1:30- 2:30, Friday 2:30-3:45 or by appointment
Syllabus
Comparison
table for the four main PDEs
Homework 1:
(due September 25) : Problems 1, 3, 4, 5, 9 pg.
85-87
Homework 2
(pdf) - due October 25
Homework 3
(pdf) - due November 15 (extension until November 19, if necessary)
Homework 4: (due
December 6): Problems 5, 6, 13, 16 pg. 290-291
Comments:
09/11 -
Regarding Kyle's question on Harnack's Inequality. One can rephrase the
question as:
If the infimum of a harmonic nonnegative function is zero on a set U,
then by Harnack's
inequality we would get that the supremum has to be zero, hence u is
constant zero. This seems
to come in contradiction with the fact that there are plenty of
nonnegative harmonic functions.
First of all, the assumption that inf u is strictly positive is not needed (as Kyle pointed out this
assumption could be eliminated anyway by shifting u so that the new
infimum is above zero). The
key to solving this apparent contradiction is given by the fact that Harnack's inequality holds for
every compactly embedded subset
V in U. For a set to be compactly embedded we have
that its
closure (which is compact) is contained in the open set, hence V can
never get too close to the boundary
of U (in fact, the distance from V to the boundary of U is strictly
positive). Thus, we can never touch the
point on the boundary of U where the minimum is attained
(by the minimum principle).
10/16 -
Regarding the Chain Rule for distributions/ weakly differentiable
functions. In order to have
d (F(u))/dx=F'(u)du/dx it is sufficient to have F Lipschitz
(W^{1,\infty} and u differentiable in the weak
sense (W^{1,p}) (Mizel). Much stronger results are available (Leoni
&
Morini).
Announcements:
- The midsemester exam will be in class on Tuesday, October
30; open notes and books will be permitted.