Problem: In △ABC, D and E are two points in the interior of side
BC such that BD = CE and
BAD =
CAE. Prove that △ABC is
isosceles.
Solution: Without loss of generality, assume that the points B, D E and C
are in that order on BC. (Otherwise exchange the labels on points D and E so
the former E becomes D′ and the former D becomes E′. Then recognize
that the common length ED can be subtracted from both lengths i.e
BD - DE = BE = BD′ and CE - ED = CD = CE′. Likewise the
common angle
DAE can be subtracted from both angles to preserve the
hypotheses.)
From vertex A to point F on the opposite side BC, let segment AF be the
angle bisector of
DAE. Let α =
BAD =
CAE. Let β =
DAF =
EAF. I
will use γ =
AFC as a parameter and express several quantities in terms of this
parameter and the fixed length AF.
Note that 0 < α < π∕2, 0 < β < π∕2 and α + β < π∕2. Note that
if γ = α + β the line
is parallel to the line
, an impossibility.
Furthermore if γ < α + β, the intersection of line
and line
has “flipped”
to the other side of A and now E and D are exterior to BC. Likewise
π - γ > α + β or a similar argument applies to lines
and
. Summarizing:
α + β < γ < π - (α + β).
Apply the Law of Sines to
to obtain

Therefore

and likewise
| FB | = AF![]() | ||
| FD | = AF![]() | ||
| FE | = AF![]() | ||
Then
| CE | = AF![]() | ||
| BD | = AF . | ||
Now using that α =
BAD =
CAE and since AF bisects
DAE, so
FAD =
FAE = β and
FAB =
FAC = α + β. Let
AFE =
AFC = γ and
AFB =
AFD = π - γ. Then
| CE | = AF![]() | ||
| BD | = AF . | ||
Simplifying
| CE | = AF![]() | ||
| BD | = AF . | ||
Now equate these expressions since BD = CE

or

Adding over a common denominator, and reducing trigonometric products to sums, obtain

Recalling that α + β < γ < π - (α + β), neither of the denominator expressions is 0.
The only way these two expressions can be equal is for cos(γ) = 0 or
equivalently γ = π∕2, hence
FCA =
FBA and △ABC is isosceles.
Commentary: Constructing this problem with GeoGebra showed me that the varying the base BC was the key to understanding the problem. That suggested rotating the base BC about the point F using the angle γ as a parameter to measure the rotation was a good way to organize the proof. The rest of the proof then organizes itself around clearly expressing the lengths BD and CE in terms of the parameter γ. Expressing the lengths yielded expressions such as sin(γ - α - β) in denominators. Again rotating segment BC about F shows that if γ = α + β the line BC is parallel to the line AB, so this parameter condition must be ruled out.